Sumit Nagal vs Alessandro Giannessi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W W L
Form
L L W L L L L W L LHead To Head: Nagal 1 - 2 Giannessi
They have played 9 sets in total, with Nagal winning 4 and Giannessi winning 5. The last match between Nagal and Giannessi was at the Perugia Challenger, 12-06-2024, Second, Clay with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 0-6 7-5 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sumit Nagal | 1 |
| Alessandro Giannessi | 2 |
Perugia Challenger(12-06-2024)
0
6
7
5
7
6
| Nagal | Stats | Giannessi |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (8-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 165 | Ranking | 823 |
| 68 | Highest Rank | 84 |
| 27 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 15 | Titles | 10 |
| 59% (339-233) | Career Total W/L | 52% (458-416) |
| $534,520 | Career Prize Money | $463,191 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 7-5 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
78%
(
80 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
| 7-5 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Sumit Nagal
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
111)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 43 | Games Won | 49 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:35:50 | Average Match Time | 2:35:50 |
| 69% (217/313) | 1st Serve % | 63% (187/295) |
| 61% (133/217) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (119/187) |
| 48% (46/96) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (62/108) |
| 52% (11/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (14/37) |
| 38% (111/295) | Return Points Win % | 42% (131/313) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
35
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Federico Iannaccone
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Ergi Kirkin
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
82 of
124)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
124
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Amine Jamji
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Sumit Nagal
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
84%
(
27 of
32)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Sumit Nagal
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
76
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(5) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Alessandro Giannessi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Dorian Juszczak
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
3-6 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
4-6 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Gerald Melzer
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
15
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
78%
(
80 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
0-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (339/233) | Win/Loss | 52% (458/416) |
| 58% (773/561) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (1038/991) |
| 53% (6537/5748) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (9673/9549) |
| 57% (98/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (42/54) |
| 62% (232/140) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (402/331) |
| 36% (9/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 32% (11/23) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 782 | Aces Total | 1752 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1233 | Total Double Faults | 2315 |
| 1:32:47 | Average Match Time | 1:22:11 |
| 473.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 543.79 |
| 68% (23791/35192) | 1st Serve % | 64% (32067/50234) |
| 64% (15298/23791) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (20996/32067) |
| 50% (5746/11387) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (9004/18169) |
| 44% (1844/4176) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (2051/4978) |
| 43% (15480/36169) | Return Points Win % | 39% (19695/49863) |
| 33% (9/18) | Slam W/L | 40% (23/34) |
| 36% (5/9) | Masters W/L | 18% (2/9) |
| 50% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
| 43% (25/33) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (50/57) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (178/128) | Challenger W/L | 52% (283/258) |
| 75% (117/39) | Futures W/L | 63% (99/58) |
| 60% (330/549) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (442/831) |
| 25% (4/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 18% (2/11) |
| 58% (84/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (143/290) |
| 49% (87/178) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (171/301) |
| 84% (354/299) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (423/351) |
| 15% (354/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (423/66) |
| 18% (218/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (449/99) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
